Archive for the ‘Chad Ratliff’ category

If You Aren’t Alarmed, You Aren’t Paying Attention

March 8th, 2010

“Just out: Economic Report of the President. If you aren’t alarmed, you aren’t paying attention” read a tweet that cascaded down my screen.  The good dean is not known for hyperbole, so I indeed paid attention.

The Economic Report of the President is an annual report written by the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers.   It’s an incredibly comprehensive document measuring the nation’s economic progress, and ultimately serves as a guide for the Administration’s domestic and economic policies.

Think there’s anything about education in there?   Better believe it.  Bits of K12′s past, present, and future are embedded.   That’s because—as much as it pains us to admit—education and business are inextricable.   There are very smart people who disagree, but I often worry that we’re not doing enough to connect the two.  Nevertheless, whether we choose to include future workforce preparation in our own educational philosophy or not, let’s take a look at how it fits into this year’s report.

The ghost of education’s past rears its head in the chart below, which shows unemployment rates for whites, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians.   Unemployment for whites has actually been on the decline since October 2009, peaking at 9.4 percent.   In contrast, the rate for blacks and Hispanics continues to rise—last measured at 16 percent and 13 percent respectively.   Interestingly, the unemployment gap, like the the achievement gap, remains largely unchanged since 1990.   Perhaps there’s a relationship between the two.

The report also cites the sectoral shifts currently changing the nature of work—and how the “Great Recession has aggravated this already challenging trend.”  It further reads, “the United States is increasingly a knowledge-based society where workers produce services using analytical skills.  The changing economy offers tremendous opportunities for American workers in high technology, in the new clean energy economy, in health care, and in other high-skill fields.”   I posted how this should be reflected in CTE programming here.

The less-sexy part of this phenomenon doesn’t sell as many books or warrant as many educonference presentations:  The labor market is also changing.  As stated in the report, “The prototypical American career once involved working for a single employer for many years, backed by a union that bargained for steady wage increases and for a pension that promised a stable, guaranteed income in retirement.”  Now, however,  “fewer than one in seven workers belongs to a union, and most people can count on changing employers several times over their careers.”  That trend is also expected to continue

What’s the problem?  Retirement.  Most pension plans now are “defined contribution“—meaning only employer contributions to the account are guaranteed, not the future benefits.   In other words, an individual who’s not financially savvy is screwed.

The educational attainment-to-income data is also in there, which most of us have seen before.  But, just in case you haven’t:  The more education someone has, the more money they’ll make.

What’s more striking is this chart:

For many years, there were more educated workers than demand for them.  But, as the trend stagnated, younger generations weren’t graduating at higher rates than older generations.  The trend led to income inequalities simply because a lower supply of college educated workers increased wages for high-skill jobs, subsequently dropping pay for lower-skill jobs needing less education.

A continuance of this trend will affect us more than we often consider.  The economics of education go beyond preparing children for the workforce, or even maintaining economic superiority.   Malcolm Gladwell describes the concept of the dependency ratio in this classic New Yorker piece.  What do you think the U.S. dependency ratio will look like when Baby Boomers retire?  Heathcare reform might help, but it’s not a fix.  Neither is education—at least not in it’s current state.

In the end, Dean Bruner and I were likely looking at this report through very different lenses, but his warning still rings true.   Education, like our economy, is in a period of transition.  Policy debates are raging across the country and even across my own state.  Politicization creates false dichotomies and we must maintain the ability to see the gray area.  We owe it to the next generation—in more ways than we realize.

Chad Ratliff is the Assistant Director of Instruction and Innovation Projects at Albemarle County Public Schools in Virginia.

Charter Schools: A Primer For Virginians

January 13th, 2010

Cross-posted from RemixED

Newly minted Secretary of Education Gerard Robinson will introduce two words new to most Virginians outside of Albemarle County and Arlington: charter schools. In this Op Ed, well-known education policy analyst Andy Rotherham of the think tank Education Sector notes:

The governor-elect can change that and bring more federal education dollars into Virginia. In Albemarle County, Superintendent Pam Moran is using chartering to improve the schools, and in Arlington, parents used to sleep on the sidewalks waiting in line for that county’s choice options. There is demand and need for more public options in Virginia.

This issue will likely be a hot-topic during the 2010 General Assembly and throughout the Commonwealth in the coming months.  There will also be lots of “reform grammar” that constituents will need to work though, so, let’s start with the fundamentals–what charter schools are, and what they are not.
Charter schools are indeed public schools–supported by public funding–so let’s move forward with the primer.  Josh Cook, a teacher/leader at Green Dot Animo Justice in South Central, L.A. (full bio), drafted the following series of posts for Edurati Review several months ago. Let’s go there next…

Josh’s series is certainly not meant to serve as evidence in one way or another on whether charter schools are right for Virginia (or anywhere else), but merely as way to build some background knowledge for lots of discussion to follow.   There are plenty of opinions on the charter model–and even a little research.  We’ll be exporing those at a later time.  Until then…

~Chad Ratliff

Eduflack Gets All Ed Techy

January 12th, 2010

Cross-posted from RemixED

Patrick Riccards thoughtfully reflects on the recent interactive whiteboard “uneveness” piece in Education Week.  His post is an important one, especially as educational technology is finally moving from cult to culture.  He writes,

From Manzo’s piece and from tales of good education technology across the nation, we know that teachers who effectively integrate technology into the wants and needs of both students and society are the ones who succeed.  To put a finer point on it, it isn’t what we teach, but rather how we teach it.  Putting Chaucer’s or Dickens’ greatest works on a Kindle does not teach handheld technologies. It uses handheld technology to deliver some of the greatest literature the world has ever read.  It provides content in a way that many of today’s students are better used to dealing with, opening their minds with great tech so we can feed them time-tested technology.

In far too many schools, we still “de-skill” students, unplugging them from the mediums they are most comfortable with to teach through methods contemporary to the buggy whip.  We unplug our students, believing that laptops, iPods, cellphones, and even whiteboards have no real place in teaching the three Rs.  As a result, students fail to see the relevance of their education as they judge the delivery and not the content.  In our quest to boost high school graduation numbers and build a more educated workforce, we should be doing everything and anything we can to better connect students to those learning and opportunity pathways.  That not only means technology, but it means well-integrated tech.

Well put.  Definitely check out the entire post.

Economic Crisis: Education’s Challenge, or Opportunity?

December 23rd, 2009

Collaboratively authored by Chad Ratliff and Pam Moran; originally posted on Customized Leadership.

Schools of our past are over. The biggest survival challenge facing educators right now is not Economic Storm ’09. It’s designing contemporary learning spaces for today’s learners. We understand our young people will be members of a national workforce competing in a global economy. They also need the skill-sets to be leaders and members of a global community. The needs of contemporary learners demand more from the education sector than ever before.

We educators know well that the human drive to learn and participate in a community runs deep. Over time, in villages and towns across the globe, this drive morphed into the place we know today as school. Tinkering around with schedules, room arrangements, new strategies, and different learning resources has become second nature for educators. Few of us have imagined schools being downsized, privatized, outsourced, or virtualized as has occurred within many companies in Corporate America. But, fellow Americans who worked in the steel mills of Pittsburgh or provided tech support in Silicon Valley once believed in the security of their workplaces, too.

John Maeda writes, “Boundaries that separate disciplines appear to be solid lines but up close are really dashed, and ready to cross.” Whether across our classrooms or across sectors –we can no longer afford to see only solid lines. To do so puts our profession, our children, and our society at risk. Contemporary learners will need to solve increasingly complicated global problems crossing geopolitical boundaries: poverty, water shortages, conflicts, and global climate change—to only name a few. Inside our borders, the rapid shift from manufacturing toward a project-driven service economy is clear. Contemporary learners will need to work collaboratively and be able to think quickly, critically, and creatively. And, whether young people leave or choose to stay and take non-fungible jobs in our local communities, they depend on us to equip them for successful entry into the workforce or college, or both. We can’t wait for the federal and state governments to make this happen. This is our job. Right here. Right now.

We must do everything we can to accelerate learning. This means eliminating the distance between learners and learning –a distance traditionally defined by the ratio of 1 teacher to 25 students or so. Today, the distance between learners and learning can be dramatically reduced. Great technological tools in the hands of youth can shift the learning distance from 1 to 25 to 1 to 1—no learning downtime, no arbitrary time limits. Young people should not have to power down when they come to school or stop learning when they leave. Neither should we.

Technology coupled with great learning practices accelerates achievement. So, how can we embrace technology to accelerate our work with young people in contemporary learning spaces? We can take down filters and facilitate social learning networks to create global learning communities. We can put handhelds, netbooks, livescribe pens, smart phones and other technologies in the hands of students and educators. We can learn how to best use these tools together, inside and outside of the place we call school. Indulging any resistance to using technology as tools for learning and administrative work can no longer be an option. If we attempt to maintain the schools of our past in a contemporary learning world, we will likely consign our schools to a Darwinian future in which all who can abandon them will do so for a continuum of customized options that we educators appear loathe to offer. Schools as we know them could become as obsolete as steel mills.

So, how do we turn the Economic Storm ’09 into an opportunity rather than a challenge of epic proportion? We must use the resources we have available to support innovation zone work—teachers and students aligned in research and development; figuring out learning for our future. This means redirecting limited resources to fund innovation projects: setting up model learning spaces, creating design labs to tinker with new approaches to curricula, and encouraging educational entrepreneurs in both public and private sectors. We cannot be afraid to fail, we cannot be afraid to learn, and we cannot be afraid to change.

If we transform our schools so that the distance between learners and learning truly becomes 1 to 1, we’ll create a learning grid that powers a future for our young people which exceeds our wildest dreams. After all, isn’t that why we’re here? It’s important to consider that doing nothing is a choice. Maintaining the status quo is a choice. What choices will we make? What choice will you make?

Dr. Pamela Moran (@pammoran) is the Superintendent of Albemarle County Public Schools and Chad Ratliff (@chadratliff) is the Assistant Director of Instruction and Innovation Projects.

Case Study: Sizing Up Baltimore’s Charter Schools

April 28th, 2009

An article in today’s Baltimore Sun serves up a wonderful real-world opportunity to examine both sides of the charter school argument.

For those unfamiliar with the charter concept, Josh does a nice job in both defining and critiquing them. Joe also offers up some thoughts here.

On her blog, The Sun’s Sarah Neufeld writes,

Here’s the report on Baltimore charter schools that I write about in today’s newspaper. Not surprisingly, the report found that academic performance at the city’s charters varies significantly. Climate-wise, they seem to be better than regular city schools, especially at the middle school level. We’ve always known that charter students (except those at neighborhood conversion charters that take the place of zoned schools) have an inherent advantage because their parents are making a choice and seeking out a quality option on their behalf. Now we know how that translates: The charters have fewer special ed, over-age and free/reduced lunch students than regular schools do. As a whole, they’re also more racially diverse, though there are examples of charters that are almost completely segregated and charters that are almost perfectly integrated. One finding that was a little surprising: There aren’t
many students coming to the charters from out of the system, though seven schools are the exception to that and draw students who wouldn’t be attending city public schools otherwise.

Last week, Jacques asked if charter schools are the ends or the means. Rather timely for this discussion.

Considering the Baltimore report, at what point do the means become unjustifiable? Does that point even exist, given the underlying goals of the education reform movement?

If charter schools are indeed ‘factories of innovation’, are we simply witnessing the natural progression of innovation underway? In the meantime, who wins? Who loses?

Introducing Professional Development Pro, Dr. Kevin Washburn

April 27th, 2009

Kevin D. Washburn is the Executive Director of Clerestory Learning, researching and developing professional development and instructional programs for educators. Kevin holds a doctoral degree in Educational Leadership with an emphasis in instruction and curriculum. His experience as a teacher in elementary through college level classrooms and positions in curriculum and instruction combine with his penchant for reading and research in both educational and scientific areas to uncover important implications for learning. Whether speaking in the classroom or convention setting, Kevin seeks to imbue a passion for quality instruction.

Kevin is the author of the Architecture of Learning instructional design model and its training program, the Writer’s Stylus instructional writing program, and co-author of an instructional reading program used by schools across the country. He is a member of the International Mind, Brain & Education Society and the Learning & the Brain Society. You can follow him on Twitter.

Ed Rev’s Renaissance Man: Introducing Jacques Arsenault

April 23rd, 2009

Jacques Arsenault grew up in a family of educators in Rhode Island, but has spent the last decade-plus as a “native” of the Washington, D.C. area. He earned his undergraduate degree in American Studies from Georgetown University, and stayed on at Georgetown to work in several roles in the offices of federal government relations, communications and media relations, and public affairs and strategic development.

In these roles, Jacques assisted in the creation and delivery of an undergraduate course titled “Public Education at the Crossroads.” He facilitated the input of Georgetown University faculty and staff who assisted in the redesign and reopening of D.C.’s McKinley Technology High School, and he was engaged in the University’s early conversations on how to coordinate and expand its involvement with public, charter and private schools in D.C.

While pursuing a Master of Public Policy degree in education, social and family policy at Georgetown University’s Public Policy Institute, Jacques strengthened his quantitative and qualitative analysis skills and explored some of the key issues and debates in education policy. His master’s thesis used the 1997 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth to explore the various demographic, cognitive and non-cognitive factors that account for differential rates of college attainment between the genders.

This engagement with achievement gaps led him to a position with Teach For America, where he served as the first director of its Politicial Leadership Initiative, building the political engagement of 14,000+ alumni, and supporting the leadership development of alumni with an interest in pursuing elected office.

Jacques has served as a tutor, a GRE instructor, a substitute teacher, a training program designer, and a thesis mentor in public, private, and for-profit education sectors, both in K-12 and higher education.

He is an avid sports fan, and aspiring chef, and a recreational musician. He blogs about these topics, as well as ed reform and effective storytelling, at http://jacquesofalltrades.tumblr.com/

Meet Ed Rev’s Resident Chemist Extraordinaire: This TFA Alum Ain’t No Average Joe

April 16th, 2009

A Teach For America alum, Joseph E. Ocando holds M.S. and B.A. degrees in chemistry from New York University. After completing undergraduate studies, he worked in molecular epidemiology with Dr. Fung-Lung Chung, designing, executing and interpreting experiments. In addition, Joe has presented original research at meetings of the American Chemical Society (1996-1998) and has co-authored five published scientific papers based on statistical analysis in highly prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals, including Cancer Research and Chemical Research in Toxicology. A sampling of Joe’s published work:

Nath, R.G., Ocando, J.E., Guttenplan, J.B. and Chung, F-L. (1998). “1,N2-Propanodeoxyguanosine Adducts: Potential New Biomarkers of Smoking Induced DNA Damage in Human Oral Tissue.” Cancer Research, 58, 581-584.

Chung, F.-L., Zhang, L., Ocando, J.E., and Nath, R.G. (1999). “Role of 1,N2-Propanodeoxyguanosine Adducts as Endogenous DNA Lesions in Rodents and Humans.” Exocyclic DNA Adducts in Mutagenesis and Carcinogenesis: IARC Scientific Publications No.150. International Agency for Research on Cancer.

To share his passion for science and learning, Joe joined Teach for America. He was placed in Washington Heights, NYC, teaching life science and math to middle school students from astonishingly low-SES backgrounds. After bringing applied cutting-edge science to this under-resourced area, he innovated manufacturing processes at a leading company in the private pharmaceutical sector, while enrolling in graduate school at the NYU Department of Chemistry.

Joe currently works as an analytical chemist in New York City and is pursuing the coveted Six Sigma Black Belt certification. In addition to his scientific work, Joe assists in Teach For America recruitment.

“No matter what I end up doing in the future,” Joe says, “Teach For America is by far the best thing I’ve ever done and probably ever will do with my life.” His TFA experience has carried over in the form of volunteering and advocating in the education world. Currently, Joe runs a start-up company producing educational rap for kids, found at http://rhymenlearn.com/.

Dems For Ed Reform Board Member To Be Named Obama’s ‘Border Czar’

April 15th, 2009

From the DFER Press Release:

Alan Bersin, a member of the DFER’s Board of Directors, today will be named to direct the Obama administration’s policy on illegal immigration and drug-related violence along the U.S. border with Mexico.

Bersin, the former superintendent of the San Diego City Schools and former California Secretary of Education, served in a similar “border czar” capacity in the U.S. Justice Department under President Clinton. The role today falls under the Department of Homeland Security.

“Alan is a lifelong Democrat whose family didn’t even consider crossing Al Shanker’s picket lines back when he was growing up in Brooklyn. He nonetheless led the way as one of the nation’s first ‘non-traditional’ big city school leaders in illustrating the significant rift within the Democratic Party on the issue of education reform,” said Joe Williams, DFER executive director. “He took a lot of hits for pointing out what should have been obvious, but he helped lead the way for the kind of thoughtful, progressive work that many Democrats are doing in education today.”

Bersin has served on DFER’s board since its formal launch in 2007.

Democrats for Education Reform (DFER) is a political action committee whose mission is to encourage a more productive dialogue within the Democratic Party on the need to fundamentally reform American public education. DFER operates on all levels of government to educate elected officials and support reform-minded candidates for public office.

Ed Rev’s West Coast Flava: Meet Josh Cook

April 9th, 2009

Joshua P. Cook was born into a life of service as a member of the Peace Corps (children born to active volunteers are born into service and paid a wage) in Halfway Tree, Jamaica. He served as a literacy tutor through Americorp as a member of the East Bay Conservation Corps in Oakland, Ca.

After a few years teaching Algebra I at Crenshaw High School in South Los Angeles, Joshua moved on to teach at a fledgling charter school, Ánimo Justice, a Green Dot Public School, in the historic South Central district. At Justice, Joshua works in his capacity as Department Chair of Mathematics to develop an Algebra & Geometry curriculum that is both conceptually challenging and friendly to students learning to speak academic English and requiring remediation in mathematics.

Joshua received his Bachelor of Arts in English Literature (though he managed to squeeze in a class in American Studies with a young Pedro Noguera) from the University of California at Berkeley. He did his teaching credential through UCLA’s Center X. Joshua is classified as a highly qualified teacher under the No Child Left Behind Act.

Joshua is an avid bicyclist. In 1999, he rode from Los Angeles to San Francisco. In 2006, Joshua and his wife were the sole American representatives on an IPPNW, anti-nuclear proliferation peace ride around the Baltic Sea. On this ride, more than 30 participants from a dozen nations cycled 1500 km from Talinn, Estonia to Helsinki, Finland. Joshua is also a musician and enjoys DJing under the moniker, DJ Regular. Visit his blog, Sweat and Technique.