Archive for January, 2009

The (Roanoke) Times, They Are A’Changin’

January 18th, 2009

An editorial in the Roanoke Times shines the light on a “radical” idea that could potentially swing the pendulum back in a positive direction for the school division.

To be sure, this is not one of the packaged, initiative-in-a-box programs that we often read about to save a struggling school district. You’ll not find a new, hollow, eduspeak buzzword attached to this one, either.

They’re talking about fundamental changes to the education model itself.

Yes, the Roanoke City Public School system is about to do the unthinkable; pay the best teachers like the professionals they are. They’re not quite sure how they’re going to do it yet, but it sure as heck looks like they’re headed in the right direction.

What we do know is that it’s neither going to be the classic blanket raise, nor, at the other end of the teacher-pay argument, tied exclusively to test scores. Instead, employees will be rewarded “for meeting individual goals that contribute to the system’s success.”

This sounds like a plan where innovation and entrepreneurism will flourish and stagnation wilts. That’s a recipe for true change. If they do this, and do it right, this will be the dawn of a new era for Roanoke City Schools.

The critics will immediately argue that some teachers may not get the extra pay because of the kids they have in their particular classroom. Let me direct these critics to Jay Matthews’ article in today’s Washington Post; “Sorting Children Into ‘Cannots’ and ‘Cans’ Is Just Racism in Disguise”

The only people who this will not benefit are the ineffective, disgruntled teachers who believe they have kids sitting in their own classrooms who cannot learn what they’re being taught. They will be forced to either re-evaluate their educational philosophies or leave the classroom altogether. Either outcome benefits children.

The hat goes off to RCPS administration.

Discussion Topics, Extra Credit and Free Food

January 16th, 2009

Martinsville City school chief Scott Kizner knows how to bring ‘em in. Kizner, an innovator and learning advocate, has been implementing creative means of mixing school and community since his arrival. Martinsville is a high-poverty community maintains double-digit unemployment year in and year out.

Like many micropolitan areas, specifically in the southeast, Martinsville is a former textile and furniture boomtown that lost over 10,000 jobs throughout the 1990′s. Micropolitan areas gather little attention from researchers or advocacy groups relative to more urban inner-cities and far-flung rural parts of the US. However, they often face the high poverty and crime rates of inner-cities as well as the challenges of a weak technological infrastructure, high unemployment rates, and a rapidly-increasing ESL population commonly found in rural school divisions.

You’ll often find pockets of “old money” from a by-gone era that still calls the shots in local government. The old guard can be resistant to change, to say the least, and few are whipping out checkbooks to spend on schools they feel haven’t directly impacted them in 30 years.

Kizner has done a commendable job connecting with various sectors of the community and is cleverly weaving a school-community blanket that will benefit all stakeholders, especially the citizens emerging from its classrooms. A few years ago he established an annual fundraising gala to provide mini-grants to support “innovative programs and projects” from entrepreneurial teachers. The high turnout has given many local philanthropists an opportunity to dust off the tuxedos and reevaluate their relationship with the school division. His latest venture, “Safe Schools / Safe Communities“, drew an unprecedented attendance of nearly 1000 and featured breakout sessions led by local agency and advocacy representatives.

The secret to the turnout, according to Kizner, was three-fold: interest in the topic, extra credit for the students, and free food. Simple means toward a significant end. He claimed, “Tonight we are a community of one…united”. Indeed.

Highly Qualified or Highly Satisfied?

January 14th, 2009

Virginia’s own Andrew Rotherham points out that even well-meaning, best-selling authors like Tom Friedman can make compelling arguments that fall just outside of the bulls eye. Our attention is directed to Kevin Carey’s objections on the Quick and the Ed, who suggests the tax-cuts-for-teachers notion could be arguable for any public servant. He even tosses in a little math to support his idea.

Rotherham skillfully brings us home again. His message, “the bottom line is that we ought to pay teachers more, but we ought to pay them differently as well, gets to the core of a key issue in public education.

Whether or not merit pay is the answer is irrelevant. The only way to discover a better model is through educational entrepreneurship and innovation. What we do know, through mounds of research, is that years of experience and degrees simply do not correlate with effectiveness. Yet, we not only continue the practice but increase the requirements.

Perhaps teacher efficacy is a better notion.

It’s time to foster an environment where our teachers can become highly satisfied instead of chasing meaningless certifications to be highly qualified.

NewSchools Venture Fund CEO Ted Mitchell Praises Choice of Arne Duncan as Secretary of Education

January 6th, 2009

“An entrepreneurial thinker who will unite education community”…

Maybe a Bailout for Public Education?

January 2nd, 2009


As our economic state continues to set precedence regarding US Government bailouts, we unashamedly ignore the source of many of our financial woes (and perhaps the long-term solution to many of them)– the current state of public education.

There seems to be striking similarities between the domestic automakers and our public schools. Just as legacy costs, outdated methods, and the sheer political power of the UAW have nearly crippled our domestic auto industry, our antiquated model of schooling continues to hemorrhage taxpayer dollars for endless diminishing returns.

However, the future effects are far more frightening when the completed product is an uneducated citizenry as opposed to a gas guzzling SUV. Just as our country has trended toward imported vehicles, we are increasingly importing talent to run our business and intellectuals to perform our research.

Why not apply the same bailout to public education that we are to our auto industry?

The timing is impeccable. While I agree that President-Elect Obama’s Keynesian stimulus plans of implementing massive infrastructure projects seem to be an appropriate, do we expect the 300,000+ recently unemployed financial services workers to start building bridges and pouring asphalt? Would we even have time to train them?

Consider that we now have ready-made army of professionals with academic and real-world backgrounds based in business, finance, and mathematics.

For less than it will cost to prop up our auto industry, could we unleash this army into our classrooms and take the first step toward securing the financial futures of our country and her next generation of leaders?

…..Bankers-to-Teachers Project?